Whereas it’s a distant risk, some on the market is likely to be cross-shopping the three-row BMW X7 with the unconventional and performance-focused BMW XM. There are some stunning similarities. Each boast a face that solely a mom might love, supply comparable inside facilities, and may be had with a potent V8 engine. Solely the XM presents a hybrid variant (the one model), however the X7 prices considerably much less.
After all, you’ve possible already thought-about these figures. You may not have regarded into the stats on every in the case of measurement. Dimensions are essential – parking, storage fitment, and total driver consolation rely largely on how huge a automobile is. So, we take an in-depth take a look at the general proportions of the 2 heaviest hitters within the BMW lineup.
|Dimension||BMW X7||BMW XM|
|Size||203.6 inches||201.2 inches|
|Width||78.7 inches||78.9 inches|
|Peak||72.2 inches||69.1 inches|
|Headroom (entrance)||41.9 inches||40.4 inches|
|Headroom (second row)||39.9 inches||38.8 inches|
|Legroom (second row)||37.6 inches||40.3 inches|
|Cargo area (behind second row)||48.6 cubic toes||18.6 cubic toes|
|Cargo area (with all seats folder)||90.4 cubic toes||64.3 cubic toes|
BMW XM vs. BMW X7 Exterior Dimensions
The BMW X7 measures 203.6 inches lengthy, stands 72.2 inches excessive, and is 78.7 inches large with out the mirrors. The XM boasts barely extra motorsport-friendly dimensions – acceptable given its identify. So, it measures 201.2 inches lengthy, boasts 69.1 inches of peak, and is (virtually an identical) 78.9 inches large with out the mirrors. Whereas these are principally very comparable stats, peak is a vital distinction between the 2. You’re marginally much less seen to different drivers, nevertheless it’s a small value to pay for the XM’s extra aggressive, low-slung suspension.
BMW XM vs. BMW X7 Inside Dimensions
Inside, it’s surprisingly shut between the 2. 38.8 inches of second-row headroom and 40.3 inches of second-row legroom within the XM are solely marginally completely different from the second row of the BMW X7. It presents 39.9 inches of headroom and 37.6 inches of legroom. Up within the driver and passenger space, the outcomes are flipped. The XM has extra headroom and fewer legroom than the X7. 40.4 inches of headroom and legroom make the XM spacious and cozy up entrance. However the identical might be mentioned for the X7, with 41.9 inches of headroom and 39.8 inches of legroom.
Solely the BMW X7 boasts a 3rd row of seats; the comparability falls flat in the event you want room for seven. What’s considerably surprising right here is that the sloping fastback roof of the XM doesn’t actually impression passenger area. Except for carrying two much less – or one much less with captain’s chairs within the X7 – the XM isn’t a lot of a compromise from the within.
BMW XM vs. BMW X7 Cargo Space Dimensions
With each automobiles of their storage-optimized configuration – all of the seats folded down – the BMW XM doesn’t stand an opportunity. The BMW X7 offers a most of 90.4 cubic toes of space for storing, whereas the BMW XM solely presents 64.3 cubic toes. Do not forget that sloping roof I used to be speaking about? Seems the most-impacted space is the trunk. I suppose you’ll nonetheless have the XM-branded bag to haul a small canine in or one thing.
After all, it’s not on a regular basis you’ll must haul <solely issues. The XM’s trunk is a measly 18.6 cubic toes of capability, nevertheless it truly bests the BMW X7 if the third row is up. You’ve solely acquired 12.8 cubic toes behind the third row, roughly the quantity of a 4 Collection’ trunk. Not rather a lot. I think most clients will fold down the third row to haul often, granting 48.6 cubic toes of stuff-stowage.
So, Which is Greater? The BMW XM vs. BMW X7?
As you may see, the BMW X7 is total bigger. That makes it more proficient at hauling each folks and stuff. Don’t neglect – the X7 can even tow as much as 7,500 kilos, whereas the XM isn’t even given a tow score. Total, the BMW X7 is the extra sensible automobile, with few actual drawbacks concerning exterior dimensions. Plus, it’s marginally simpler on the eyes, I suppose.